The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Commissioner of Central Excise and Service Tax v. M/s Reliance Industries Ltd. [Civil Appeal No. 6033 of 2009 dated July 04, 2023] held that the assessee was bonafide and has correctly discharged duty liability by relying on the CESTAT decision even though the same was later overturned by the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Facts:
M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd. (“the Respondent”) on the basis of the CESTAT judgment IFGL Refractories Ltd v. Commissioner of central excise, [2001 (134) ELT 230] wherein it was held that duty benefits received by the assessee under the exemption scheme cannot be considered as part of the consideration flowing from the buyer, either directly or indirectly.
However, the judgement of the CESTAT was overturned by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of IFGL Refractories Ltd. on August 09, 2005 and held that monetary value of duty benefits obtained by the customers constituted additional consideration flowing to the assessee from the customers.
On the basis of the Hon’ble Supreme Court judgement, the Revenue Department issued a Show Cause Notice to the Respondent on September 28, 2005 (“the SCN”) demanding tax on the monetary value of the duty benefits that it had obtained from its customers and further alleged that the Respondent has deliberately suppressed relevant facts and had made wilful misstatements withholding material information and documents from the departmental officer.
The allegations in the SCN were confirmed by the Ld. Commissioner of Central Excise vide an order dated October 30, 2006 (“the Order”).
Aggrieved by the order of the Commissioner of Central Excise the Respondent challenged the Order before the CESTAT.
The CESTAT vide order no. M/419-21/WZB/AHD/08 dated March 17, 2009 (“the Impugned order”) set aside the demand and inter alia held that that during the relevant period the Respondent have entertained a bonafide belief that it had correctly discharged its duty liability in view taken by the Kolkata Tribunal in the case of IFGL Refractories Ltd (supra) which was later overturned by Hon’ble Supreme Court on August 09, 2005.
Aggrieved by the Impugned order the Revenue Department filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
Issue:
Whether the Respondent is liable to pay penalty on account of suppression fact by relying on the judgement which was later overturned by higher authority?
Held:
The Hon’ble Supreme Court in Civil Appeal No. 6033 of 2009 held as under:
- Noted that, the Respondent has self-assessed the liability on the assessable value on the basis of an interpretation given by the CESTAT in its order in the case of IFGL Refractories Ltd.
- Observed that, the Respondent had communicated to the Revenue Department about their pricing policy by giving separate letters, which holds a bonafide belief that the Respondent has correctly discharged the liability.
- Opined that, the mere fact that the belief was ultimately found to be wrong by the judgment IFGL Refractories Ltd, does not render make the belief malafide, more particularly when such a belief was originate from the view taken by a division bench of the CESTAT.
- Clarified that, the term “suppression of facts” should not be interpreted as a mere act of omission. It should be considered a deliberate act of non-disclosure aimed at evading duty.
- Held that, the Respondent’s conduct during the period 2000 to 2005, of not including the monetary value of the duty benefits in assessable value, could not be considered to be malafide when it merely followed the view taken by the Tribunal.
Our Comments:
The above judgement highlights the important ratio-decendi that the higher authority’s judgement will not give any effect on the act done before the date of pronouncement of judgement.
In other words, the lower authority’s judgement will be treated as valid till the time any adverse decision is passed by the higher authority and only from that point of time when judgment (passed by the higher authority) would be made applicable.
(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)
DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.
________________________________________________________________________________
 |
| 🚨LIMITED TIME Special Combo Offer On: 🚨
🔰 Online Recorded GST Courses on “GST Input Tax Credit (ITC)” & “Scrutiny Notices, Assessment, Audit, Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST”
👨🏻🏫 By CA (Adv) Bimal Jain
🔖 Register Now:
https://www.a2ztaxcorp.in/product/special-combo-offer-on-online-recorded-gst-courses-on-gst-input-tax-credit-itc-scrutiny-notices-assessment-audit-inspection-search-seizure-and-arrest-under-gst-by-ca-adv-bimal-jain/
📌 Please Note: This Special Combo Offer is valid till July 16, 2023
📝 Key features of the course:
✔️ E-Certificate to all participants
✔️ Background Material (BGM) available in PDF (Downloadable basis)
✔️ Dedicated WhatsApp group, Telegram and E-mail for Free Subscription of GST Updates for 1 Year
✔️ Hindi/English medium
✔️ Special 45% Discount on our latest ‘GST Law and Commentary with Analysis and Procedures’ – May 2023 Edition
✔️ A total of 7 Recorded Sessions (3 Hours each), will be available for 42 hours or 60 Days whichever expires earlier
About Speaker:
CA (Adv) Bimal Jain
- FCA, FCS, LLB with 24 Yrs. of Experience in Indirect Taxation – GST, Service Tax, Excise, Customs, VAT/CST, FTP, DGFT matters etc.
- Chairman of Indirect Tax Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce
- Author of books on Goods and Services Tax, “GST LAW AND COMMENTARY (With Analysis and Procedures)” [8th Edition – May 2023]
Online Recorded GST Course on GST Input Tax Credit (ITC) by CA (Adv) Bimal Jain
Coverage of the Course :
- What is the Eligibility and Condition for claiming ITC- Section 16 with practical scenarios and examples
- Requirement and reversal of ITC (Rule 37)
- Interplay of Valuation – GST ITC
- Schedule I vs Rule 37 Comparative Study
- Rules and Provision for Offset of ITC – Case Study
- Concept of Claim – Reversal – Reclaim
- Clarification on Non Filing of GSTR-1 and GSTR 3B
- Other provision of Section 17 for reversal of common ITC and reversal as per Rule 42/43 for Input, Input Service & Capital Goods
- Exclusions in value of exempt supplies for the purpose of reversal of common credit ITC as per rule 42 and 43
- Exclusion of interest income and other exempt services from aggregate value of exempt supplies for reversal of common ITC as per rule 42 and 43
- Special Provision for Banking, Financial Institutions, NBFC’s
- Blocking of ITC (Rule 86A)
- Restrictions on use of amount available in electronic credit ledger (Rule 86B)
- Order of utilization of input tax credit (Rule 88A)
- Manner of calculating interest on delayed payment of tax (Rule 88B)
- Availability of credit in special circumstances
- ITC on opening stock of inputs at the time of registration
- ITC on stock of inputs available to person taking voluntary registration
- ITC on opening stock of inputs and capital goods available on opting out of composition scheme
- ITC on stock of inputs and capital goods when exempted goods or services become taxable
- ITC reversal on closing stock of inputs on switching to composition scheme/ wholly exempt supplies
- Transfer of ITC in case of sale, merger, demerger, amalgamation, etc.
- Transfer of ITC on obtaining separate registration for multiple places of business within a state or UT
- Removal of capital goods or plant and machinery
- Taking ITC in respect of inputs and capital goods sent for job-work
- Manner of distribution of credit by Input Service Distributor
- Manner of recovery of credit distributed in excess
- Apportionment of Credit
- Meaning of Taxable & Exempt Supply
- Credit used exclusively for Taxable supply / exempt supply
- Common Credit
- Supplies for personal consumption etc.
- How to apportion the credit
- Blockage of Credit in respect of
- Motor Vehicles, Vessels and Aircraft; their servicing repair & maintenance.
- Food & beverages, outdoor catering beauty treatment, health services, cosmetic & plastic surgery, renting or hiring of motor vehicles, and others
- Woks contract services
- Membership of Club, Health and Fitness Centre
- Goods & Services provided to employees
- Travel benefits to employee
- Construction of immovable property on own account
- Tax paid under composition scheme
- Goods or services received by a non-resident taxable person
- Goods or services used for CSR activities
- Goods or services used for personal consumption
- Gifts, free samples and goods lost or written off
- Tax paid in fraud cases, confiscation etc.
- ITC on Works Contract and Construction of Immovable Property related issues such as:
- Installation of lift
- Overhead crane
- Construction of warehouse for leasing
- Civil construction for installation of machinery etc.
- Credit on free gifts, samples, goods lost, stolen or destroyed etc.
- ITC & Tax paid under Section 74, 129 and 130
- Discussion on various important judgments on ITC
- How to prove genuineness of transactions to avail GST IT
- ITC can be claimed during revocation of cancelled GST registration
- Claiming Time Barred ITC for the period of Cancellation
- ITC availability on vouchers and subscription packages
- Constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) challenged in various cases
- Constitutional validity of Section 16(4) challenged in various cases
- Case laws on rectification of error or omission made while filing GST statements/ returns/ forms
- Other important case laws on GST ITC
- Open House: Question and Answer
Online Recorded GST Course on Scrutiny Notices, Assessment, Audit, Inspection, Search, Seizure and Arrest under GST By CA Bimal Jain
Key topics of the course:
- When inspection, search and seizure can be initiated
- Offences – Bailable & Non-Bailable
- Various Penalty & Imprisonment provisions
- Legal Jurisprudence on Search and Seizure
- Constitutional validity of Search & Seizure by both CGST & SGST Authorities
- Inspection of goods in movement and penalty proceedings u/s 129 & 130 with recent changes in Union Budget 2021
- Legal Jurisprudence of Coercive actions by the Dept during Search & Seizure and collection of tax revenue
- The constitutional validity of arrest provisions before adjudication
- Legal Jurisprudence of Arrest Provisions
- Legal validity of Recovery Proceedings in GST
- Provisional attachment of Property or Bank Account – When Why and Recourse available
- Power to summon persons to give evidence and produce documents
- Access to business premises
- Officers to assist proper officers
- Validity of Multiple or Parallel Proceedings
- Various Assessments under GST viz. Self-Assessment, Provisional Assessment, Summary Assessment
- Scrutiny of Returns, Assessment of Non-Filers of Returns
- Audit by GST Department and Special Audit under GST Laws
- Preparation and Handling of GST Audit
- Procedure during department audit
- Proceedings of Demand and Recovery
- Certain Offenses and Penalties
For details, or any queries,
📞: 8076563802, 011 42427056
📧: info@a2ztaxcorp.com, intern@a2ztaxcorp.com
A2Z Academy
DDA Flat No. 650, Pocket 5, Mayur Vihar, Phase 1
New Delhi – 110091
Mobile: +91-8076563802
E-mail: info@a2ztaxcorp.com
Website: www.a2ztaxcorp.in
|
