Delhi HC: No limitation period applicable on refund of duty paid by mistake
The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy is a registered society set up by the Ministry of Finance, Planning […]
The National Institute of Public Finance and Policy is a registered society set up by the Ministry of Finance, Planning […]
M/s T.M Motors Pvt. Ltd., is a dealer of Maruti Suzuki Ltd., who not only sells cars but also undertakes
Rule 6, “CENVAT reversal” amount recovery permissible from customers M/s Jyoti CNC Automation Ltd, had used CENVAT able inputs and
THE petitioner contends that the proceedings in this case deserve to quashed on the primary ground of inordinate delay in disposal
The Supreme Court of India in the case of CCE, Jaipur-I vs. Kent Chemicals (P.) Ltd. stated that the said product ‘Light Liquid
1. Where assessee, a dealer of Maruti car, received certain amount by way of rebates/discounts/incentives in price of car, assessee was
Where assessee had failed to upload returns because of some system error, he was directed to apply to Nodal Officer
Where assessee had undertaken construction work of widening and deepening of canals, construction of flood protection wall, construction of storm
Where Competent Authority had seized goods of assessee under transport and demanded bank guarantee for release of same and assessee
As per CESTAT, New Delhi bench, Classification of services Section 65(23) of the Finance Act, 1994 Cargo handling service for Period 15-4-2004 to