Notice for re-assessment quashed by Hon’ble HC, Bombay as the Assessee fully, truly disclosed all material facts
In M/s Ananta Landmark Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 2814 of 2019 […]
Important Pronouncements
Important Pronouncements
Important Pronouncements
Taking credit and then reversing the same entry is as good as not taking the credit at all
In M/s Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories v. Commissioner of Customs, Central Excise & Service Tax [Order No. 70247-70248/2021 dated November 5,
Important Pronouncements
Notice for re-assessment quashed by Hon’ble HC, Bombay as the Assessee fully, truly disclosed all material facts
In M/s Ananta Landmark Pvt. Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Ors. [W.P. (C) No. 2814 of 2019
Important Pronouncements
HC Raps revenue for failing to act on a transitional-credit claim despite directions
In M/s Siddharth Enterprises through Anr. v. The Nodal Officer [TS-625-HC(GUJ)-2021-GST dated October 14, 2021] Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed
Important Pronouncements
HC Raps revenue for failing to act on a transitional-credit claim despite directions
In M/s Siddharth Enterprises through Anr. v. The Nodal Officer [TS-625-HC(GUJ)-2021-GST dated October 14, 2021] Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed
Important Pronouncements
HC Raps revenue for failing to act on a transitional-credit claim despite directions
In M/s Siddharth Enterprises through Anr. v. The Nodal Officer [TS-625-HC(GUJ)-2021-GST dated October 14, 2021] Hon’ble Gujarat High Court observed
Important Pronouncements
As per Consumer Protection Act losing a case on merit could not be termed as deficiency in service by the advocate: Supreme Court
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nandlal Lohariya v. Jagdish Chand Purohit and Ors. [S.L.P. (C) Diary No. 24842 of 2020, decided
Important Pronouncements
As per Consumer Protection Act losing a case on merit could not be termed as deficiency in service by the advocate: Supreme Court
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nandlal Lohariya v. Jagdish Chand Purohit and Ors. [S.L.P. (C) Diary No. 24842 of 2020, decided
Important Pronouncements
As per Consumer Protection Act losing a case on merit could not be termed as deficiency in service by the advocate: Supreme Court
Hon’ble Supreme Court in Nandlal Lohariya v. Jagdish Chand Purohit and Ors. [S.L.P. (C) Diary No. 24842 of 2020, decided
Important Pronouncements
Service tax not leviable on commercial coaching or training services
In M/s Asian School of Media Studies v. Commissioner of Central Goods and Service Tax [Final Order Nos. 70251-70252 /