ITC of recipient cannot denied without conducting due diligence of supplier

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in Suncraft Energy Private Limited and Another v. The Assistant Commissioner, State Tax [MAT 1218 of 2023 dated August 02, 2023] set aside the order of reversing excess credit availed in Form GSTR-3B as compared to Form GSTR-2A and held that the demand notice issued to the assessee for reversing the ITC could not be sustained without proper inquiry into the supplier’s actions.

Facts:

M/s. Suncraft Energy Private Limited (“the Petitioner”) sells goods to the customers and charges GST from them and at the time of filing Form GSTR-3B avails ITC on inward supplies. However, some suppliers did not disclose the supplies in their Form GSTR-1 of the financial year 2017-18. Accordingly, such transactions never auto-populated in Form GSTR-2A of the Petitioner.

The Revenue Department (“the Respondent”) issued notice to the Petitioner based on mismatch of ITC between Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-3B.

A Show Cause Notice was issued to the Petitioner on December 06, 2022 (“the SCN”) demanding to reverse the excess ITC claimed by the Petitioner in the financial year 2017-18 on the basis of ITC mismatch in Form GSTR-3B and Form GSTR-2A.

The Petitioner filed the reply to the SCN on January 06, 2023 and January 11, 2023 respectively, denying the allegations made in the SCN and among other things submitted that the Petitioner has paid the taxes to the supplier pertaining to the transaction and only thereafter has availed the ITC on said inward supplies.

The Petitioner contended that despite having fulfilled all the conditions as enumerated under Section 16(2) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (“the CGST Act”) the department erred in reversing the credit availed and has directed the Petitioner to deposit the tax that had already been paid to the supplier at the time of purchasing goods and services.

The Adjudicating Authority passed an order on February 20, 2023 (“the Impugned Order”) to demand for payment of tax of INR 6,50,511 along with applicable interest and penalty.

Aggrieved by the Impugned order, the Petitioner filed an appeal before the Hon’ble Calcutta High Court.

Issue:

Whether ITC can be denied to the recipient without conducting a proper investigation of the supplier?

Held:

The Hon’ble Calcutta High Court in MAT 1218 of 2023 held as under:

  • Observed that, the issuance of a demand notice on the recipient of service on account of a mismatch in Form GSTR-2A and Form GSTR-3B ITC cannot be sustained without any investigation being done at the end of the supplier whose invoices are not reflecting in Form GSTR-2A.
  • Opined that, only in exceptional cases, such as collusion between the recipient and the supplier or the supplier’s absence or closure of business, proceedings can be initiated against the recipient.
  • Relied upon the Judgement of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Union of India v. Bharti Airtel Ltd. And Ors. (2022) 4 SCC 328 wherein the court held that, Form GSTR-2A is only a facilitator for taking a confirm decision while doing such self-assessment. Non-performance or non-operability of Form GSTR-2A or for that matter, other forms will be of no avail because the dispensation stipulated at the relevant time obliged the registered persons to submit return on the basis of such self-assessment in Form GSTR-3B manually on electronic platform.
  • Clarified that, denial of ITC to the recipient cannot be made without any investigation of the supplier.
  • Held that, the demand notice issued to the Petitioner for reversing the ITC availed could not be sustained without proper inquiry into the supplier’s actions.

(Author can be reached at info@a2ztaxcorp.com)

DISCLAIMER: The views expressed are strictly of the author and A2Z Taxcorp LLP. The contents of this article are solely for informational purpose and for the reader’s personal non-commercial use. It does not constitute professional advice or recommendation of firm. Neither the author nor firm and its affiliates accepts any liabilities for any loss or damage of any kind arising out of any information in this article nor for any actions taken in reliance thereon. Further, no portion of our article or newsletter should be used for any purpose(s) unless authorized in writing and we reserve a legal right for any infringement on usage of our article or newsletter without prior permission.

___________________________________________________________________________________

📢 FREE Webinar on “Blockchain and Virtual digital asset with overall taxation implications including GST” by CA Riddhi Jain & Adv (CA) Bimal Jain

🔖 TODAY is the LAST Day !! Register Now !!

🔖 A2Z Academy is Organizing a FREE Webinar On:

📢“Blockchain and Virtual digital asset with overall taxation implications including GST”

🗓️ Date: August 04, 2023, Friday

⏰ Time: 8:00 PM to 9:00 PM (IST)

🎤 Speakers:

👨🏻‍🏫 CA Riddhi Jain
Expert in Crypto Currency

👨🏻‍🏫 CA (Adv) Bimal Jain
Chairman of Indirect & GST Committee of PHD Chamber of Commerce

Registration Link 🔗: 

https://zoom.us/webinar/register/WN_Kbvufgm6TyW-avGx6_3mfw

Coverage:

  • 📝 What is Block chain technology and Virtual digital assets?
  • 📝 What is the current legal status of virtual digital assets in India?
  • 📝 What is Income Tax implication on virtual digital assets in India?
  • 📝 How does the taxation of virtual digital assets differ from that of traditional financial assets?
  • 📝 How are virtual digital assets classified for taxation purposes under GST?
  • 📝 What is the GST rate applicable to the sale of virtual digital assets?
  • 📝 Are there any exemptions or special provisions for virtual digital assets under the GST?
  • 📝 How do crypto exchanges and other intermediaries comply with GST regulations?
  • 📝 Q&A and open discussion

Limited seats available

Follow us on our social media for more updates:

🔹 Facebook🔹 Twitter🔹 LinkedIn🔹 Instagram🔹 YouTube

Scroll to Top