Unused CENVAT Credit does not incur any interest liability
The CESTAT, Kolkata in M/s. National Aluminium Company Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax [Excise Appeal No.52 […]
The CESTAT, Kolkata in M/s. National Aluminium Company Limited v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax [Excise Appeal No.52 […]
The CESTAT, Chennai in M. Vijayabharathi v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 42320 of 2014
The CESTAT, Chandigarh in the case of Bajrang Lal Gupta v. The CCE Gurgaon [Service Tax Appeal No. 560 of
The CESTAT, Chennai in M/s. T.A.F.E Access Ltd. v. Commissioner of GST & Central Excise [Service Tax Appeal No. 526 of
The CESTAT Bangalore in M/s. Steel Authority of India Ltd. v. The Commissioner of Central Excise [Appeal No. E/562/2008 dated
The CESTAT Kolkata in the matter of M/s. Kanhaiya Singh Vision Classes Private Limited v. Commissioner of CGST & CX,
The CESTAT, Kolkata in M/s. Bhootpurva Sainik Kalyan Sangh v. Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax [Service Tax Appeal
The Chandigarh Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the penalty under Section 114 A
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has allowed the Cenvat Credit to Hindustan
The Kolkata Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that reimbursable expenses are not