Breast Pump is not a Medical Device, classifiable under CTH 39269090: CESTAT
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that breast pumps have nothing to do […]
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that breast pumps have nothing to do […]
The Delhi High Court has ruled that the services provided by M/s Ernst and Young Limited (India), the Indian Branch Office of
The Supreme Court has held that no separate notice under Section 11A of the Central Excise Act is necessary for the
The Supreme Court while ascertaining who is the “Related Party” under the Central Excise Act for the purpose of valuation
The Bombay High Court has quashed and set aside the rejection of the Petitioner’s declaration for SVLDRS-1. The division bench of Justice Nitin
The Karnataka High Court has held that only the Central Government can make provision for prohibiting, restricting, or regulating the import or
The Karnataka Authority for Advance Ruling (AAR) has ruled that the supply of goods to an overseas customer is treated neither as
The Madhya Pradesh High Court has directed the state/commercial tax department to refund the pre-deposit amount paid during the appeal with 6%
The Mumbai Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has held that the amount deposited in the Personal Ledger Account
The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) has observed that central excise duty is not payable on capital