SC dismisses review of order denying GTA services credit upto buyer’s premises post-2008
The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed review petition against its order which held that Cenvat credit on GTA service availed […]
The Hon’ble Supreme Court has dismissed review petition against its order which held that Cenvat credit on GTA service availed […]
National Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) rules in favour of Honda Car dealer, finds no merit in application filed under Rule 128
Classification of goods – Heading No. 8409, read with Heading No. 8511, of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 –
Section 112 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Section 86 of the Finance Act, 1994 – Appellate Tribunal, appeals to – Whether
Rule 6 of CCR, 2004 – Trading – General practice amongst the masses to not consider trading as an ‘exempted
Whether reimbursement received by a dealer for supply of spare parts free of cost to its customers under warranty period,
THE assessee had received sales rejections from their customers [Ch 39 & 63 of CETA, 1985] and the same were scrapped.
Section 16 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Rule 10 of the Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 – Input tax credit –
HC holds that Customs authorities cannot add more than 20% of FOB value as ‘freight charges’ to arrive at assessable
GST: Applicant was facilitating recruitment / enrolment of students to foreign Universities. Promotional service were incidental and ancillary to above